The Six Team Conditions: Hackman's Team Effectiveness Model

Rate your team on J. Richard Hackman's six conditions for team effectiveness, then fix the weakest first.

Try this health check live

Six conditions explain a large share of why teams succeed.

J. Richard Hackman spent his career on one question: why do some teams thrive and others fail? The answer he and Ruth Wageman landed on is the Six Team Conditions: three essentials (a real team, a compelling purpose, the right people) and three enablers (sound structure, supportive context, team coaching). Their research suggests these account for a large share of the difference in team effectiveness. This check diagnoses your team against all six.

Dimensions

The Essentials

The three foundational conditions that must be in place before any team can perform: a real team, a compelling purpose, and the right people.

  • Real Team

    We have clear, stable membership, and everyone knows who's on this team and who isn't.

    • Fuzzy, shifting membership
    • Membership is mostly clear
    • Clear, stable membership

  • Compelling Purpose

    We have a clear, challenging purpose that we genuinely care about.

    • Unclear or uninspiring purpose
    • Purpose is somewhat clear
    • Clear, compelling purpose

  • Right People

    We have the mix of skills and perspectives the work needs.

    • Missing key skills or perspectives
    • Most skills are covered
    • Right mix of skills and perspectives

The Enablers

The three supporting conditions that let a well-founded team reach its potential: sound structure, a supportive context, and timely coaching.

  • Sound Structure

    Our size, tasks and norms are set up well for getting the work done.

    • Poorly structured for the work
    • Structure is adequate
    • Well structured for the work

  • Supportive Context

    We get the information, resources, rewards and support we need from the wider organization.

    • Little organizational support
    • Some support in place
    • Strong organizational support

  • Team Coaching

    We get helpful coaching at the right moments to work better together.

    • Little or no coaching
    • Occasional coaching
    • Timely, helpful coaching

When to use this health check

  • When standing up a new team, to design it right from the start.
  • When a capable team keeps underperforming and you suspect the setup, not the people.
  • As the evidence base for a case to leadership about what a team needs to succeed.
  • Before a reorganization or a change in membership, to see which conditions the change could weaken.

Tips & tricks

  • Score the three essentials first. The enablers only pay off once the essentials are solid.
  • Start with a low 'Real Team' score (fuzzy or shifting membership), because it undermines everything else.
  • When you share results with leadership, point to the research: these are conditions a manager can change, not complaints about people.
  • Pick one condition to work on each quarter and re-run the check to see whether it moved.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Hackman Team Diagnostic?
It's a team-effectiveness assessment based on the work of J. Richard Hackman and Ruth Wageman, whose research identified six conditions that account for a large share of the difference in how effective teams are. This check adapts that model so your team can diagnose how it's set up and where to improve.
What are the six team conditions?
Three essentials and three enablers. The essentials: a real team (clear, stable membership, with people who depend on each other to get the work done), a compelling purpose (clear, challenging and worth caring about) and the right people (the skills, perspectives and teamwork ability the work needs). The enablers: a sound structure (a sensible team size, well-designed tasks and clear norms of conduct), a supportive organizational context (the information, resources and rewards the team needs) and team coaching (help with how the team works, at the moments it can use it). The essentials come first; the enablers only pay off once they are in place.
How is this different from a quick pulse check?
A pulse check captures how the team feels in the moment. The Six Team Conditions diagnoses how the team is designed and set up: the structural conditions that research links to lasting effectiveness.
What is Hackman's model of team effectiveness?
Richard Hackman, a Harvard organizational psychologist, argued that no leader can make a team great directly. What a leader can do is set up the conditions that make good performance more likely. His model, developed with Ruth Wageman, names six of those conditions, and their research found the conditions account for a large share of the difference in how effective teams are. That is why the model is used to check a struggling team's setup before blaming its people.
What is the Team Diagnostic Survey?
The Team Diagnostic Survey (TDS) is the validated instrument Ruth Wageman, Richard Hackman and Erin Lehman published in 2005 to measure the six conditions. It is proprietary and licensed separately. This health check is a lighter, team-facing adaptation of the same model, one statement per condition in TeamRetro's own wording, built to be run with the team and discussed. TeamRetro is not affiliated with the TDS authors.

Based on J. Richard Hackman, Leading Teams (2002) and the Six Team Conditions / Team Diagnostic Survey (Wageman, Hackman & Lehman, 2005). The TDS itself is a validated proprietary instrument; this is a conceptual adaptation.

Related health checks