Five things your brain treats as survival. Is your team getting them?
The SCARF model, from neuroscientist David Rock (2008), maps the five things the brain treats as survival-level social needs: Status, Certainty, Autonomy, Relatedness and Fairness. When any one is under threat, people disengage; when they're met, people commit. Turn the model into a team-climate read — rate how well your team currently meets each of the five, then talk about the one that scores lowest.
Dimensions
The five domains
David Rock's five brain-based social drivers — Status, Certainty, Autonomy, Relatedness and Fairness — that shape how threatened or rewarded people feel at work.
Status
People on this team feel their contribution is recognised and valued.
- Strongly disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Strongly agree
Certainty
We have enough clarity about what's coming to feel secure about our work.
- Strongly disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Strongly agree
Autonomy
People here have real say over how they do their work.
- Strongly disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Strongly agree
Relatedness
This team feels like a group who trust and look out for one another.
- Strongly disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Strongly agree
Fairness
Decisions, workload and recognition on this team feel fair.
- Strongly disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Strongly agree
When to use this health check
- Ahead of or after a big change (reorg, new leader, new process) when threat responses spike.
- When engagement dips and you want to find the source.
- As a lens for 1:1s and team offsites.
Tips & tricks
- SCARF is a threat-vs-reward map — the lowest score is where people feel most threatened, so start there.
- Change reliably hits Certainty and Autonomy, so run it around change and re-run afterwards.
- Scores are personal — keep it anonymous the first time.