Agile Teams Maturity Model

Assess how your agile team collaborates, delivers, and continuously improves across six maturity dimensions.

Run in TeamRetro

Measure and grow your agile team's maturity

Strong agile teams blend healthy collaboration, disciplined ways of working, and a culture of continuous improvement to deliver customer value predictably. This assessment helps agile teams reflect across six dimensions — from teamwork and ceremonies to technical excellence and mindset — using a staged maturity scale that runs from Ad Hoc to Optimized. By rating where they sit today, teams uncover their strengths, surface hidden blockers, and agree on the practices worth investing in next. Use it as a recurring agile health check to track progress over time, spark honest retrospective conversations, and build a shared roadmap toward higher-performing, self-organizing delivery.

Dimensions

Teamwork & Collaboration

How well the team communicates, shares ownership, and works together to deliver value.

  • Team Communication

    Team members communicate openly and effectively.

    1. Ad HocCommunication is unclear, infrequent, or avoided. Misunderstandings are common.
    2. EmergingTeam communicates but inconsistently; some hesitancy or gaps remain.
    3. DefinedCommunication is generally good; occasional issues occur but don't derail work.
    4. ManagedTeam communicates clearly and often, enabling smooth collaboration.
    5. OptimizedCommunication is proactive, transparent, and high-trust, enabling rapid alignment.

  • Collaborative Problem Solving

    The team collaborates to solve problems rather than working in silos.

    1. Ad HocTeam members work independently; problems bounce between people without resolution.
    2. EmergingSome collaboration occurs, but silos remain strong.
    3. DefinedTeam collaborates when needed; silos occasionally appear.
    4. ManagedSmooth collaboration with shared ownership of challenges.
    5. OptimizedHighly collaborative team that tackles problems collectively and efficiently.

  • Raising Blockers Early

    Team members are comfortable raising blockers and challenges early.

    1. Ad HocBlockers are hidden or raised late; fear or uncertainty affects transparency.
    2. EmergingSome members raise issues, but not consistently across the team.
    3. DefinedBlockers are usually raised, though sometimes delayed.
    4. ManagedTeam reliably surfaces issues early, enabling quick resolution.
    5. OptimizedTotal psychological safety; issues surfaced immediately, leading to fast learning cycles.

  • Cross-Functionality

    The team is cross-functional enough to deliver work end-to-end.

    1. Ad HocTeam depends heavily on outside specialists; delivery frequently blocked.
    2. EmergingSome key capabilities still missing; partial reliance on external resources.
    3. DefinedMost core skills present; occasional external help required.
    4. ManagedTeam is largely self-sufficient with all major skills covered.
    5. OptimizedFully cross-functional, high-ownership team capable of complete end-to-end delivery.

  • Self-Organization & Ownership

    The team is self-organizing and takes ownership of how work gets done.

    1. Ad HocWork is assigned externally; team has little autonomy.
    2. EmergingTeam shows some autonomy but still depends on direction from outside.
    3. DefinedTeam plans and organizes work with moderate independence.
    4. ManagedTeam reliably self-manages and owns its workflow.
    5. OptimizedFull empowerment; team continuously adapts and improves how it organizes work.

Agile Ways of Working (Processes & Ceremonies)

How effectively the team uses agile ceremonies and processes to stay aligned and keep work flowing.

  • Daily Standups

    Daily standups help us synchronize effectively.

    1. Ad HocStandups unfocused or skipped; provide little value.
    2. EmergingStandups occur but often run long or lack clarity.
    3. DefinedStandups provide basic alignment most days.
    4. ManagedStandups are concise and consistently improve team coordination.
    5. OptimizedFast, energizing syncs that drive clarity, unblock flow, and enable shared ownership.

  • Backlog Refinement

    Backlog refinement keeps upcoming work understood and ready.

    1. Ad HocRefinement rarely happens; work surfaces unprepared.
    2. EmergingRefinement inconsistent; many items unclear or incomplete.
    3. DefinedMost items refined to a usable level; occasional gaps remain.
    4. ManagedBacklog consistently well-prepared, enabling smooth planning and delivery.
    5. OptimizedHighly effective refinement; backlog remains healthy, focused, and value-aligned.

  • Sprint Reviews & Demos

    Sprint reviews (or demos) help us share progress and gather feedback.

    1. Ad HocReviews skipped or poorly attended; minimal feedback received.
    2. EmergingReviews occur but feedback is inconsistent or passive.
    3. DefinedUseful demos; some stakeholder engagement.
    4. ManagedStrong engagement and actionable feedback that shapes future work.
    5. OptimizedReviews drive continuous learning; stakeholders actively participate and value them.

  • Retrospectives & Improvement

    Retrospectives lead to useful insights for improving how we work.

    1. Ad HocRetros rarely happen, or produce little insight.
    2. EmergingRetros happen but improvements rarely implemented.
    3. DefinedInsights are good; some improvements stick.
    4. ManagedImprovements are consistently applied and benefit delivery.
    5. OptimizedRetros are transformative; team rapidly iterates on behaviors and practices.

  • Flow of Work

    Work items flow smoothly through our process without unnecessary delays.

    1. Ad HocWork gets stuck; bottlenecks common and unmanaged.
    2. EmergingSome tracking exists but flow remains uneven.
    3. DefinedFlow improving; occasional bottlenecks addressed.
    4. ManagedFlow stable and predictable; blockers resolved quickly.
    5. OptimizedContinuous flow mindset with proactive identification and removal of waste.

Planning & Prioritization

How well the team plans, prioritizes, and forecasts work to maximize value and predictability.

  • Value-Driven Backlog

    The product backlog is prioritized and reflects customer value.

    1. Ad HocBacklog unordered; priorities unclear or outdated.
    2. EmergingSome prioritization occurs; value alignment inconsistent.
    3. DefinedBacklog mostly prioritized; value considered in decisions.
    4. ManagedClear, value-driven prioritization; PO and team aligned.
    5. OptimizedLean, continuously optimized backlog tightly aligned to customer and business value.

  • Team Involvement in Planning

    The team participates meaningfully in planning work.

    1. Ad HocPlanning decisions made externally; team has little input.
    2. EmergingTeam gives input occasionally but not consistently.
    3. DefinedTeam contributes to planning; influence moderate.
    4. ManagedTeam shapes plans collaboratively and confidently.
    5. OptimizedCo-created plans with full ownership, realistic commitments, and shared accountability.

  • Estimation & Forecasting

    The team's estimates or forecasts help guide realistic commitments.

    1. Ad HocEstimates unreliable; commitments frequently missed.
    2. EmergingEstimating attempted but inconsistent or inaccurate.
    3. DefinedEstimates reasonably helpful; some variability persists.
    4. ManagedAccurate, collaborative estimates guide stable commitments.
    5. OptimizedForecasts highly predictable; team refines estimation continuously with data.

  • Adaptive Planning

    Plans adapt based on new information without excessive disruption.

    1. Ad HocChange causes chaos and significant rework.
    2. EmergingTeam adapts slowly; disruptions significant.
    3. DefinedChanges manageable; team adjusts with moderate ease.
    4. ManagedTeam adapts efficiently; minimal disruption to flow.
    5. OptimizedHigh adaptability; team embraces change as part of Agile learning.

  • Definition of Done

    We understand what "done" means and use it consistently.

    1. Ad HocNo shared definition; team often disagrees on what's complete.
    2. EmergingSome criteria exist but inconsistently applied.
    3. DefinedShared DoD used but occasionally stretched.
    4. ManagedClear, reliable DoD followed consistently.
    5. OptimizedStrong quality discipline; "done" is rigorous, enforced, and evolves with learning.

Technical Excellence & Quality

How consistently the team builds in quality, manages technical debt, and sustains a healthy codebase.

  • Quality Built-In

    Quality is built into our work through testing and review practices.

    1. Ad HocQuality checked late; bugs common.
    2. EmergingSome testing and reviews, but inconsistent or shallow.
    3. DefinedBasic quality practices established; effectiveness varies.
    4. ManagedStrong testing and review discipline leads to predictable quality.
    5. OptimizedQuality deeply embedded; continuous testing and fast feedback loops.

  • Technical Debt Management

    The team addresses technical debt proactively.

    1. Ad HocTechnical debt ignored or grows unchecked.
    2. EmergingDebt occasionally discussed but rarely addressed.
    3. DefinedDebt visible; team works on it when feasible.
    4. ManagedDebt managed regularly; part of planning and decision-making.
    5. OptimizedDebt systematically prevented, minimized, and eliminated through continuous improvement.

  • Test Automation

    Automated tests or checks support our development process.

    1. Ad HocLittle or no automation; heavy manual testing.
    2. EmergingSome automated tests, but coverage limited.
    3. DefinedModerate automation supporting key areas.
    4. ManagedStrong automated testing integrated into the workflow.
    5. OptimizedHigh automation enabling rapid, reliable, continuous delivery.

  • Continuous Integration

    We integrate and test code frequently to avoid large integration issues.

    1. Ad HocIntegration infrequent; large merge issues common.
    2. EmergingSome regular integration, but breaks frequent.
    3. DefinedTeam integrates reasonably often; occasional failures.
    4. ManagedFrequent, stable integration with reliable results.
    5. OptimizedContinuous integration culture with fast, automated verification.

  • Maintainable Codebase

    The team maintains a sustainable, maintainable codebase.

    1. Ad HocCodebase deteriorating; difficult to understand or extend.
    2. EmergingSome improvements made, but structural issues persist.
    3. DefinedMaintainability is acceptable; standards enforced inconsistently.
    4. ManagedCodebase generally clean, consistent, and easy to evolve.
    5. OptimizedHighly maintainable codebase supported by strong engineering discipline.

Product Delivery & Customer Value

How frequently and reliably the team delivers valuable increments and learns from customer feedback.

  • Delivery Frequency

    We deliver working software or product increments frequently.

    1. Ad HocReleases rare, unpredictable, or painful.
    2. EmergingDelivery more frequent but still irregular.
    3. DefinedRegular increments delivered; some delays occur.
    4. ManagedReliable delivery cadence with predictable outcomes.
    5. OptimizedFrequent, fast delivery with minimal friction; value released continuously.

  • Value Alignment

    Our work directly contributes to customer or business value.

    1. Ad HocWork output-driven with unclear value alignment.
    2. EmergingSome prioritization by value, but not consistent.
    3. DefinedTeam generally aligns with value; occasional mismatches.
    4. ManagedClearly value-driven; team understands impact.
    5. OptimizedValue tightly embedded in decision-making; team maximizes outcomes.

  • Feedback Loops

    We gather customer or stakeholder feedback regularly.

    1. Ad HocLittle or no feedback; customer insights missing.
    2. EmergingFeedback sporadic and informal.
    3. DefinedFeedback somewhat regular; used to guide decisions.
    4. ManagedConsistent feedback loops shaping product direction.
    5. OptimizedFast, continuous feedback cycles driving rapid learning and innovation.

  • Speed to Release Change

    Changes and improvements can be released quickly when needed.

    1. Ad HocReleases slow; lead time unpredictable.
    2. EmergingSome ability to release faster but still inconsistent.
    3. DefinedTeam can release improvements reasonably quickly.
    4. ManagedFast, low-risk releases with good automation and process control.
    5. OptimizedNear-continuous delivery; improvements shipped quickly and safely anytime.

Agile Mindset, Culture & Continuous Improvement

How deeply the team lives agile values — sustainable pace, learning, adaptability, and a drive to keep improving.

  • Sustainable Pace

    The team maintains a sustainable work pace.

    1. Ad HocFrequent overtime and burnout.
    2. EmergingWorkload fluctuates; pace slowly stabilizing.
    3. DefinedGenerally sustainable, with occasional spikes.
    4. ManagedConsistent, healthy pace supported by realistic planning.
    5. OptimizedSustainable pace deeply embedded; team energized, predictable, and resilient.

  • Continuous Improvement Mindset

    We actively look for ways to improve our process or outcomes.

    1. Ad HocLittle focus on improvement; same problems persist.
    2. EmergingTeam beginning to discuss improvements occasionally.
    3. DefinedImprovements identified and implemented at a moderate rate.
    4. ManagedRegular improvement with measurable positive impact.
    5. OptimizedContinuous improvement mindset; experimentation routine and celebrated.

  • Learning from Mistakes

    Mistakes are treated as learning opportunities rather than blame events.

    1. Ad HocBlame culture; mistakes hidden or punished.
    2. EmergingSome psychological safety developing; still cautious.
    3. DefinedMistakes usually discussed constructively.
    4. ManagedHigh trust; team learns openly from problems.
    5. OptimizedStrong growth mindset; mistakes fuel innovation and rapid learning.

  • Embracing Change

    The team embraces change and adapts when needed.

    1. Ad HocChange resisted; team becomes rigid under pressure.
    2. EmergingTeam attempts to adapt but struggles when plans shift.
    3. DefinedTeam adapts reasonably well; moderate flexibility.
    4. ManagedTeam adapts smoothly; change absorbed with minimal disruption.
    5. OptimizedHigh adaptability; team thrives in dynamic environments and embraces continuous evolution.

When to use this health check

  • Periodically (e.g. quarterly) to track how your agile team's maturity is trending over time.
  • When onboarding a new team and you want a baseline across collaboration, process, and delivery.
  • Ahead of a retrospective or team offsite to focus discussion on the highest-impact improvement areas.
  • When delivery feels unpredictable and you want to pinpoint whether the gap is in planning, flow, quality, or culture.
  • During an agile transformation to compare maturity across multiple teams and prioritize coaching.

Tips & tricks

  • Have everyone rate independently before revealing results so scores aren't anchored by the loudest voice.
  • Focus the conversation on dimensions with the widest spread of opinion — they often reveal hidden misalignment.
  • Don't chase a perfect 'Optimized' everywhere; pick one or two dimensions to move up a level each cycle.
  • Re-run the same check each quarter and compare trends rather than absolute scores.
  • Pair each agreed improvement with an owner and a check-in date in your next retrospective.

Frequently asked questions

What does the Ad Hoc to Optimized scale mean?
Each dimension is rated on a five-level maturity scale — Ad Hoc, Emerging, Defined, Managed, and Optimized — that describes increasingly mature and consistent practices. It helps teams see not just where they are, but what 'better' looks like next.
Who should take part in this health check?
The whole delivery team — developers, testers, designers, the product owner, and the scrum master or team lead. Broad participation surfaces different perspectives and builds shared ownership of the results.
How often should we run it?
A good rhythm is every quarter or every few sprints. Running it regularly lets you track maturity trends over time and measure the impact of the improvements you commit to.
Is this tied to Scrum specifically?
No. While it references common ceremonies like standups, reviews, and retrospectives, the dimensions apply to most agile and iterative delivery approaches, including Scrum, Kanban, and hybrids.
What should we do with the results?
Use them to guide a focused conversation, ideally in a retrospective. Pick one or two dimensions to improve, assign owners, and revisit progress when you next run the check.