Liked

What did we like about the last sprint?

The daily standups were focused and efficient
Great collaboration when we paired on the authentication feature
The new code review process helped catch issues early
Learned

What did we learn from the last sprint?

Breaking down tasks into smaller chunks improved our velocity
The new testing framework requires more initial setup time
Cross-training team members reduces bottlenecks
Lacked

What do we think was missing from the last sprint?

Clear acceptance criteria for the new features
Sufficient time for proper code review
Regular updates from the client team
Longed for

What could we have done better in the last sprint?

More time for innovation and technical debt reduction
Better coordination with the design team
Clearer prioritization of backlog items

What is the Four Ls Retrospective?

The 4Ls retrospective asks your team four questions about the last sprint: what you Liked, what you Learned, what you Lacked and what you Longed for. Mary Gorman and Ellen Gottesdiener developed the format, and it's a common pick for Scrum Masters because it's easy to explain and covers facts and feelings in one session. Liked and Learned bring out the good news: the practices worth keeping and the lessons the team picked up along the way. Lacked and Longed for point at what was missing and what people wish they'd had, which is usually where your next actions come from. Giving Learned its own column means lessons get written down instead of getting lost among the wins. And because Longed for is framed as a wish, people can raise a gap without it sounding like a complaint.

Four Ls Retrospective Format

Liked

What did we like about the last sprint?

Focus on positive experiences and successful outcomes. Encourage participants to share specific examples of what worked well, from processes to interactions. This helps identify practices worth continuing and builds team morale.

Learned

What did we learn from the last sprint?

Capture new insights, discoveries and lessons. These could be technical skills, process improvements or things people learned about working together. Remind the team that successes and failures are both worth learning from.

Lacked

What do we think was missing from the last sprint?

Address gaps and missing elements without assigning blame. Guide the discussion toward constructive identification of areas that need attention, whether they're resources, processes, or capabilities.

Longed for

What could we have done better in the last sprint?

Focus on the improvements the team wishes for and concrete ways to get there. Ask participants for realistic changes that would help the team work better and feel more satisfied in future sprints.

When to use this retrospective

  • When you want a balanced look at what went well and what needs work
  • In regular sprint retrospectives, when you want feedback on both the work and the way the team worked
  • When new team members are joining their first retrospectives, since the four categories are easy to follow
  • When the team needs some structure to sort its thoughts before discussing them

Suggested icebreaker questions

  • If you could instantly master one new skill that would help the team, what would it be and why?
  • What's one thing you learned recently that surprised you?

Want a warm-up your team plays, not just answers out loud? Browse free icebreakers →

Ideas and tips for your retrospective meeting

  • Start with Liked to warm the room up before moving on to what was missing
  • Timebox each L so one category doesn't take over the session
  • Ask for specific examples, since a named problem is easier to act on than a general complaint
  • Look for patterns across the four columns, such as a Lacked item that explains something people Longed for
  • Write actions that close the gaps in Lacked and Longed for, and keep doing what people Liked
  • Use dot voting to decide which items to tackle first

Frequently asked questions

What are the 4 Ls in a retrospective?
Liked, Learned, Lacked and Longed for. Your team uses them to reflect on what went well, what you learned, what was missing and what you wish you'd had during the sprint.
How do you run a 4Ls retrospective?
Give everyone a few minutes to add notes privately under each of the four Ls, then group similar notes and discuss each column in turn. Vote on the Lacked and Longed for items that matter most and turn the top one or two into actions.
When should a team run a 4Ls retrospective?
Run it at the end of a sprint or project phase when you want feedback on what went well and what was missing, not only on problems. It's also a good first format for a team that's new to retrospectives.
Who created the 4Ls retrospective?
Mary Gorman and Ellen Gottesdiener developed the 4Ls as a way for teams to look back on facts and feelings in one session.
What's the difference between Lacked and Longed for?
Lacked covers what was missing during the sprint, like clear acceptance criteria or time for code review. Longed for covers what people wish they'd had, which often points to a change you can try next sprint.
Ready to run this retrospective?Try this retrospective live