DevOps Retrospective

Review deployments, incidents and handoffs between dev and ops.

Try this retrospective live

Successful Deployments

What went well during recent deployments?

The automated testing and deployment pipeline worked flawlessly for the latest release.
Collaboration between dev and ops during the pre-deployment phase helped catch potential issues early.
The rollback plan we had in place allowed us to quickly revert a problematic deployment.
Areas for Improvement

What challenges did we face, and how can we do better?

The lack of automated testing for certain components led to unexpected issues in production.
Communication gaps between dev and ops teams caused delays and rework.
Insufficient monitoring and alerting made it difficult to detect and respond to issues promptly.
Collaboration and Culture

How can we improve teamwork and build a DevOps culture?

Cross-training and job shadowing could help bridge the gap between dev and ops teams.
Implementing a blameless postmortem culture would encourage open discussions and learning.
Regular knowledge-sharing sessions could improve understanding of each team's challenges.
Tools and Processes

How can we optimize our tools, technologies, and processes?

Implementing infrastructure as code could improve consistency and reduce manual effort.
Adopting a microservices architecture could improve scalability and resilience.
Investing in better monitoring and observability tools would provide deeper insights.

What is a DevOps Retrospective?

DevOps (a portmanteau of "development" and "operations") is a set of practices and tools that help an organization deliver applications and services faster than traditional software development processes. A DevOps retrospective brings developers and operations people into one meeting to look back at recent releases, incidents and the way they worked together. The board has four columns. Successful Deployments covers what went well in recent releases. Areas for Improvement collects the problems, from gaps in automated testing to missing runbooks. Collaboration and Culture looks at how dev and ops work together, including on-call, handoffs and postmortems. Tools and Processes is for changes to your pipeline, infrastructure and monitoring. Run it after a major release or outage, or on a regular monthly or quarterly schedule. Keep it blameless so people talk about what really happened, and leave with a few changes that each have an owner. The next round of deployments will tell you whether they worked.

DevOps Retrospective format

Successful Deployments

What went well during recent deployments?

Start with what worked in recent deployments, and ask what made it work so you can repeat it.

Areas for Improvement

What challenges did we face, and how can we do better?

Keep it blameless. Ask what happened and what made it hard, and look for the process or tooling gap behind each problem.

Collaboration and Culture

How can we improve teamwork and build a DevOps culture?

Talk about where dev and ops still throw work over the wall, and what would make running the service a shared responsibility.

Tools and Processes

How can we optimize our tools, technologies, and processes?

Look for manual steps worth automating and workflows with too many handoffs. Pick the change that would save the most time or remove the most risk.

When to use this retrospective

  • After a major release or deployment, to review how it went.
  • Every month or quarter, to keep improving how you build and run software.
  • When the same bottlenecks or failures keep showing up in your build and deployment pipeline.
  • After you introduce new tools, technologies or processes, to check whether they're helping.
  • After a significant incident or outage, to find root causes and agree on prevention.

Suggested icebreaker questions

  • If you could automate one manual task, what would it be and why?
  • Share a recent 'aha' moment or learning experience related to DevOps practices.

Want a warm-up your team plays, not just answers out loud? Browse free icebreakers →

Ideas and tips for your retrospective meeting

  • Keep it blameless so people share what really happened during incidents and deployments.
  • Invite both development and operations. Each side sees problems the other doesn't.
  • Spend most of the time on what to change, and only enough on past mistakes to understand them.
  • Give every agreed action an owner and a date.
  • Name the people behind smooth releases and incident fixes. That work often goes unnoticed.
  • Change the format now and then so the retrospective doesn't go stale.

Frequently asked questions

What is a DevOps retrospective?
It's a meeting where development and operations look back at recent deployments, incidents and collaboration together. The board covers successful deployments, areas for improvement, collaboration and culture, and tools and processes.
How is a DevOps retrospective different from a sprint retrospective?
A sprint retrospective looks at a team's general sprint work. A DevOps retrospective focuses on how software gets built, shipped and run, so deployments, incidents, pipelines and on-call come up more.
How often should a team run a DevOps retrospective?
Many teams run one after each release cycle, or monthly or quarterly. Running one soon after a major incident also helps, while the details are fresh.
Who should attend a DevOps retrospective?
Developers, operations or SRE staff, QA and anyone who's on call or owns the pipeline. Getting both dev and ops in the same room is the point.
How is it different from an incident postmortem?
A postmortem goes deep on one incident. A DevOps retrospective looks across recent releases and incidents to find patterns in your process and tooling.

Related templates

Product Development Process

Step back from sprints and review how you build products.

Support Tools and Resources Retrospective

Find out what's helping your support team and what isn't

Ticket Resolution Retrospective

Find what slows down your team's ticket handling

Escalation Process Retrospective

Review how recent escalations were handled and fix the gaps.

Ready to run this retrospective?Try this retrospective live