Algorithms That Worked

What processes or behaviours delivered great results?

Our daily stand-ups were tight and focused this sprint — everyone knew their priorities and blockers were resolved fast.
The pair programming sessions we ran mid-sprint really helped us catch bugs early. We should keep doing this.
Breaking the epic into smaller tickets made it so much easier to track progress. The board actually made sense this time!
System Glitches

What errors or failures slowed the team down?

We kept getting blocked waiting for sign-off from stakeholders. The approval process needs a timeout or escalation path.
The CI pipeline was flaky all sprint — we wasted hours re-running builds that should have passed first time.
Requirements changed halfway through the sprint without a proper impact assessment. It threw off our estimates completely.
Missing Gaps

What knowledge gaps or missing information held us back?

We didn't have clear acceptance criteria for two of the stories. We had to guess what 'done' looked like.
The new team member didn't have access to the right systems for the first three days. Onboarding docs need updating.
Nobody knew who owned the legacy service we were integrating with. We spent a day just trying to find the right person.
Upgrade Requests

What improvements or experiments should we run next?

I'd love to try a short 'pre-mortem' at the start of each sprint to anticipate what might go wrong before it does.
We should automate the release notes generation — it takes too long manually and it's error-prone.
Let's try capping WIP to two items per person. I think we'll move faster if we focus more.

What is the AI Agents Assemble Retrospective?

The AI Agents Assemble retrospective uses the metaphor of AI systems to help teams analyze successes, uncover glitches, and surface blockers for targeted improvement. By framing team dynamics through the lens of intelligent agents — each with inputs, outputs, and the occasional system error — this format makes it easier to talk honestly about what's working, what's breaking down, and what needs a reboot. It's a fresh, engaging way to run a retrospective that resonates especially well with tech-savvy teams. Inspired by the world of autonomous AI agents that collaborate, adapt, and self-correct, this retrospective invites your team to think of themselves as a high-performing system. Just like a well-designed AI pipeline, great teams depend on clean inputs, efficient processing, and reliable outputs. When something goes wrong, you don't blame the machine — you debug it. This format encourages a blameless, systems-thinking mindset that leads to more constructive conversations and actionable outcomes. Whether you're a software engineering team, a product squad, or any group that loves a good tech metaphor, the AI Agents Assemble retrospective brings energy and creativity to your regular cadence. Use it to celebrate your wins, identify the bugs slowing you down, and align on the upgrades your team needs to level up. It's the perfect retrospective for teams who want to reflect smarter, not harder.

AI Agents Assemble Retrospective Format

Algorithms That Worked

What processes or behaviours delivered great results?

This topic is the team's equivalent of a well-trained model — the routines, habits, and decisions that consistently produced positive outcomes. Encourage participants to be specific about what worked and why, so the team can consciously repeat and reinforce these behaviours. Ask: 'What would we want to keep running in the next sprint?'

System Glitches

What errors or failures slowed the team down?

Just like a software bug, a system glitch is something that caused unexpected behaviour or a drop in performance. This topic surfaces the friction points, miscommunications, and process failures that got in the way. Encourage a blameless tone — focus on the system, not the individual. Ask: 'If we were debugging this, what would the error log say?'

Missing Gaps

What knowledge gaps or missing information held us back?

An AI agent is only as good as the data it's trained on. This topic explores the gaps in knowledge, documentation, onboarding, or shared understanding that limited the team's effectiveness. Facilitators should help the team distinguish between one-off knowledge gaps and systemic issues that need a longer-term fix. Ask: 'What information, if we'd had it earlier, would have changed our approach?'

Upgrade Requests

What improvements or experiments should we run next?

Every great AI system is continuously improved through iteration and feedback. This topic is where the team proposes upgrades — new processes, tools, experiments, or behaviours they want to try in the next cycle. Encourage bold ideas as well as small tweaks. Ask: 'If you could push one update to how we work, what would it be?'

When to use this retrospective

  • When your team wants a fresh, creative spin on the standard retrospective format that still drives meaningful outcomes.
  • Ideal for tech or engineering teams who will connect naturally with AI and systems-thinking metaphors.
  • Use it after a sprint or project phase where there were notable successes and failures worth unpacking in a structured but engaging way.
  • Great for teams experiencing recurring blockers or knowledge gaps that haven't been surfaced through traditional retrospective formats.
  • When you want to energise a team that has grown fatigued with the same retrospective structure and needs a new lens to spark honest conversation.

Suggested icebreaker questions

  • If you were an AI agent, what would your core function be — and what's your most common error message?
  • If your team were an AI model, what dataset would you say you've been trained on, and what data are you still missing?

Ideas and tips for your retrospective meeting

  • Set a blameless tone early — remind the team that just like debugging software, the goal is to fix the system, not point fingers at individuals.
  • Timebox each topic to keep energy high. AI Agents Assemble works best as a fast-paced session; aim for 10–12 minutes per topic.
  • Encourage specificity in 'System Glitches' — vague complaints like 'communication was bad' are hard to act on. Push for concrete examples and root causes.
  • Don't let 'Upgrade Requests' become a wishlist. For each idea, ask the team to identify an owner and a first small step to make it actionable.
  • If the team is new to the AI metaphor, spend 2–3 minutes at the start framing the analogy — it helps people engage more creatively with the prompts.
  • Watch for patterns across topics. If the same theme appears in both 'System Glitches' and 'Missing Training Data,' it's likely a high-priority systemic issue worth addressing first.

New to retrospectives? Read our guide on how to run a retrospective →